Somersault of the planet. The earth can "tumble" at any moment. Earth's magnetic poles and their true position

Recently, television broadcasts have literally been flooded with programs and programs that foreshadow a series of planetary and space disasters in the near future that can wipe humanity off the face of the entire planet in the shortest possible time. “It can happen at any moment!” say the hosts and participants of such programs, describing the terrible scenarios of the Apocalypse, from which any sane person's hair begins to move on his head.

I will make a reservation right away - I am not among the unbridled optimists who can make fun of such topics and do not take them seriously. But I also try to be pragmatic about the content of such television versions of the End of the World, considering them as important food for further thought.

In this small publication I will try to sum up a small intermediate result of such reflections. I didn’t sit under the apple tree, and the apple didn’t fall on my head (not the season yet). And yet, perhaps, someone will be interested in the reasoning indicated here.

So, in one of the TV shows (perhaps it was “Secret Signs” on TV-3) they talked about the so-called “Dzhanibekov effect”. Our cosmonauts, while in Earth orbit, discovered that any object moving freely along an arbitrary trajectory in weightlessness, for inexplicable reasons, performs a complex somersault around its axis with a certain regularity. Indirectly, it was suggested that all the major planetary catastrophes that occurred to our planet during its existence with enviable frequency, entailed cardinal climate changes, the death of civilizations, caused a cardinal turn in evolution, could be associated precisely with this "Dzhanibekov effect" - somersaults of the Earth , the change of geographic, magnetic poles and the consequences caused by these truly apocalyptic phenomena.

On impressionable people, it works, I must say, one hundred percent. Hit, as they say, "in the top ten." Humanity now lives with a gun to its head, which can go off at any moment. However, the impossibility of latent mass psychosis and its consequences are of interest to the author of these lines.

The experiments discussed and shown on the television program were carried out with a round object consisting of a homogeneous substance (something like a plasticine ball). The spectacle is really mesmerizing: the ball moves smoothly and evenly in weightlessness in a straight line, and suddenly, without any influence from the outside, it makes a complex somersault (something like a “figure eight”), and then continues to move evenly further. And again - somersault - movement - somersault - movement (see Figure 1). The rhythmic change of these states without any apparent reason, at least, indicates that we still know very little about the properties of the space around us and the forces acting in it.

However, does this effect apply to our planet? In a word, will somersault us to the fullest with all the ensuing consequences?

Assumption 1st.
The experiment on the space station was carried out with an object of homogeneous matter, while our Earth consists of matter of different densities: a relatively solid metal core floats in molten magma, like a chicken yolk in a raw egg white. A good housewife knows how to determine whether an egg is raw or hard boiled. You need to spin the egg on the table. The boiled one will spin, and the raw one will quickly stop, because the yolk, hanging in the protein, will prevent this rotation, “minus” it.
From all the above “culinary” example, I dare to draw the first conclusion: the metal core in the center of the Earth is a kind of balance regulator that will not allow the planet to make a somersault (after all, there are forces that cause such an effect) or, at least, significantly reduce the consequences such a somersault.

The same vibration damping principle was used in the construction of Taiwan's Taipei skyscraper. Between the 87th and 91st floors of this 101-storey building with a total height of 500 m, a 660-ton steel ball is suspended on cables, which acts as an inertial vibration damper and makes the building more stable during an earthquake or hurricanes.

Assumption 2.
The experiment was carried out on the space station not only with a small object, but also on such a small interval of its motion, which allows us to consider it as a motion along a strictly straight line, and, importantly, to consider the gravitational influence as a constantly acting, uniform factor (intervals between somersaults occur more often than changes the position of the object relative to the dominant gravitational fields (see Figure 1).

When we consider the motion of the Earth around the Sun in an elliptical orbit, we will see that when the earth is positioned at different points in the orbit, gravitational forces act mainly on different points on the earth's surface (see Figure 2). In addition, we will have to take into account the combination formed when centrifugal and centripetal forces merge, which is clearly not observed when a small body moves inside the space station space (again, Figure 1).

For example: a person who is on the surface of the Earth is small enough compared to the entire planet, so he perceives its surface not as a sphere, but as a plane. If a person climbs onto a ball with a diameter of, for example, 10 m, then the ratio between the size of a person and the size of the ball can no longer be neglected, and the person will perceive the surface of the ball as a sphere.

From all of the above, I dare to assume that the “Dzhanibekov effect” discovered by our cosmonauts is not applicable to all coordination systems and must take into account changes in the position of the body relative to the dominant center of gravity in the event that the relationship between the body and the dominant center of gravity cannot be neglected.

P/S/
However, the astronomical fact known to everyone from school that the earth's axis is not static, but constantly fluctuates, may just be a manifestation of the "Dzhanibekov effect" on a planetary scale.

(Pictures will be added later)

Reviews

The equations describing the rotational motion and the "complex somersaults" related to it were derived as early as the 18th century. Euler. The theory can be read here:

L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifshits. Theoretical physics. T. 1. Mechanics. M .: Nauka, 1973 (paragraph 37 - Asymmetric top).

So there is no mysticism in the Dzhanibekov effect. You can be sure that this effect does not threaten the Earth.

Analysis of the causes and applicability of the Dzhanibekov effect to the Earth: additional arguments in favor of the validity of the unified theory of natural phenomena of the earth and its important consequences for substantiating the main reason for the imminent Apocalypse

The effect of somersaults in space - the Dzhanibekov effect, fully confirms my theory of the imminent Apocalypse from the growing inversion - the reversal of the Earth's geomagnetic field. As this somersault of the Earth increases, the magnetosphere, ionosphere and atmosphere will also disappear. Judge for yourself The Earth is a natural electric machine, the rotor of which is itself, and the stator is located above it and in the ionosphere of the planet.
Likbez

In any electric DC machine, you can reverse the rotation of the rotor. To do this, it is enough to change the direction of the vector of its magnetic field, for example, by switching the polarity of the sign-constant voltage on its excitation winding. If you do this quickly, then its braking will be fast and the subsequent reverse rotation of its rotor in the opposite direction will also be fast.

And if you make the reversal of its magnetic field smoothly in such an electric machine, then the reverse of its rotor will also be smooth, but it will happen - that's for sure. All competent electricians know this! The analogy here with our planet is almost complete, because our Earth is also a unipolar DC electric machine, only natural. This means that, like any unipolar DC electric machine, it is now in the process of increasing GMMF inversion, is also in the same electrodynamic mode and begins to actively slow down in the process of reversing its geomagnetic field, i.e. on the rise begins to change the speed and direction of its axial rotation to the opposite.
But since the earth is incomparably larger compared to Dzhanibekov's nut, this process is immeasurably longer in time
Summary

This means that the Earth is simply obliged to “tumble”, i.e. to reverse the axial rotation to the opposite (in the case of a reverse-flip of its GMFZ, the geomagnetic field axis vector changes by 180 degrees)
What to do?

In order to prevent this complete somersault of the planet and the death of civilization from it (as well as mammoths earlier), it is urgent to compensate for the decreasing and reversing geomagnetic field of the Earth in the process of GMMF inversion. That is why the whole world needs to create a controlled artificial GMPZ. Why and when this will happen - read more in my articles.
Why are world science and the public silent?

In 2009, the geomagnetic poles of the planet have already shifted by 200 km, and this is only the beginning of the active phase of the progressive inversion of the GMF. Further, the GMMF inversion rate will only increase, and rapidly! But the world is still silent.
Apparently, civilization has not yet realized the essence of what is happening with Nature and the tragic consequences of this inversion of the GMMF for all of us. And the mortal danger hanging over it from this global process for all of us. Most likely, this silence is a consequence of the World Crisis and the relative stagnation in world science and numerous other problems of civilization during the real Global World Crisis.

And perhaps a consequence of the regression of the world community or something else is not yet clear. Personally, I associate this silence of scientists and the public about the Imminent Catastrophe with the incomplete knowledge of World science about the essence of many natural phenomena. Natural scientists must clearly understand these most important consequences of the GMMF inversion on the whole of Nature. Their naivete and hope for a chance just amaze me!

I also do not understand the lack of will and inaction of the WORLD PUBLIC and those institutions of civilization that are responsible for its integrity and the preservation of it and Nature. These are the parliaments of the countries and its international associations of public unions and organizations, including the UN, UNESCO, its public figures and all of us. Everyone is silent in such a difficult dramatic period of time of the existence of civilization, against the background of the active phase of the GMMF Inversion, which is fraught for all of us with a complete global catastrophe for the entire civilization.

The strange thing about this silent wait-and-see attitude is that many of them are probably aware of this progressive reversal of the GMPD. And they probably partly understand that it is the constantly weakening geomagnetic field of the Earth that protects all of us and living Nature from harsh solar radiation and, in addition, also ensures the operation of the natural cold machine of the planet. They understand and know that the geomagnetic field is an indispensable condition for life on the planet and that it must be saved! They understand and know - but they are silent!
CONCLUSIONS:

Civilization and Nature of the planet are in mortal danger due to the acceleration of the GMMF inversion!
Get it people!

I came to this important conclusion based on my Knowledge of natural phenomena, accumulated over the years, from my experiences and my Unified Theory of Natural Phenomena. It is in this significant weakening of the geomagnetic field that the main objective cause of global climate warming and the Flood lies - but no one really knows and does not understand this!
And this is fraught with a complete global catastrophe for the entire civilization, since it is the geomagnetic field that protects us from harsh solar radiation and ensures the operation of the natural cold machine.

The position of our planet in space may change.

NASA scientists have released images of Antarctica from space. Compare them with the previous ones. And they assure: the ice in the region of the Southern continent has increased. The analysis shows that since the beginning of the 70s of the last century, the ice cover has been growing here at a rate of 18,900 square kilometers per year. And now it has reached a record area of ​​20 million 140 thousand square kilometers.

“The glaciation of the Antarctic is a consequence of global warming, which cannot be denied,” explains researcher Claire Parkinson (Claire Parkinson, a senior scientist at NASA\’s Goddard Space Flight Center). - There is no paradox here - the Earth is a single organism and the processes in it are interconnected. Somewhere global warming is changing the climate in one direction, and somewhere in the other. Here is the ice: it grows at the South Pole, and disappears at the North. Over the same 40 years, its quantity in the Arctic Ocean decreased at a rate of 53,900 square kilometers per year. Total: the decline for the entire planet only along the poles is 35,000 square kilometers.

And yet, scientists have not yet figured out exactly what mechanisms are involved in the rapid accumulation of ice at the South Pole. What they admit.

Obviously, if the amount of ice at the North Pole decreases, and at the South Pole increases, then the planet - at least its mantle - becomes heavier at one pole and lighter at the other. Some scientists, who adhere to, to put it mildly, original views, are very afraid of this redistribution of weight. After all, as they believe, the violation of the polar balance - a kind of "polar warp" - can lead to the fact that the Earth will make a somersault. That is, the axis of its rotation will shift by a certain number of degrees. And this has allegedly already happened in the history of our planet - it led to the global flood.

According to another, no less crazy version, not the entire ball does a somersault, but only its lithospheric shell. Once upon a time, supporters of this version argue, a similar shift, which occurred as a result of the "polar skew", moved the green and blooming Antarctica from temperate latitudes to the place where it is now located. And the continent is frozen.

According to rumors, the somersault hypothesis was supported by Albert Einstein himself. And he even explained the phenomenon by the interaction of centrifugal forces arising from the rotation of the Earth, and asymmetric masses of ice.

However, it is possible that the problem is not in the polar asymmetry. And not in global warming, therefore. And the reason for the somersault in the very essence of our planet is that it rotates, being in weightlessness.

They say that a Soviet cosmonaut, twice a hero of the USSR, Vladimir Dzhanibekov, while on the Salyut-7 orbital station in 1985, watched a nut flying in weightlessness and at the same time rotating. I noticed that after a while it turns over 180 degrees, then again - and somersaults first in one direction, then in the other, continuing to fly.

For the sake of experiment, Vladimir Aleksandrovich launched a plasticine ball, one “pole” of which was heavier than the other - there the astronaut attached a small weight. And the ball began to tumble.

The effect of rotation of a body rotating around an axis that does not coincide with the main axes of inertia is called the "Dzhanibekov effect".

There are quite serious scientists who believe that the Earth is also subject to the “Dzhanibekov effect”. And she tumbles from time to time. Since it orbits in weightlessness, it rotates around an axis that does not coincide with the main axes of inertia. And it can not coincide, both from processes in the bowels and on the surface.

This article opens a series of publications covering the author's vision of the topic "Pole Shift" on the example of the Dzhanibekov effect. The author takes the liberty to contribute to the disclosure of the topic and invite the readers of the site to get acquainted

• with what physical causes cause the phenomenon
• with how you can determine the position of the past geographic pole
• with the author's reconstruction of a planetary catastrophe

and other interesting finds... Happy reading!

Dzhanibekov effect

During his fifth flight on the Soyuz T-13 spacecraft and the Salyut-7 orbital station (June 6 - September 26, 1985), Vladimir Dzhanibekov drew attention to the effect, seemingly inexplicable from the point of view of modern mechanics and aerodynamics, manifested in the behavior of the most common nut, more precisely nuts "with ears" (lambs), which fixed metal tapes that secure bags for packing things when transporting goods into space.

Unloading another transport ship, Vladimir Dzhanibekov tapped one ear of the "lamb" with his finger. Usually he flew away, and the astronaut calmly caught him and put him in his pocket. But this time, Vladimir Alexandrovich did not catch the nut, which, to his great surprise, having flown about 40 centimeters, suddenly turned over on its axis, after which it flew further, still rotating. After flying another 40 centimeters, she turned over again. This seemed so strange to the astronaut that he twisted the "lamb" back and again hit it with his finger. The result was the same!

Being unusually intrigued by such a strange behavior of the “lamb”, Vladimir Dzhanibekov repeated the experiment with another “lamb”. He also turned over in flight, however, after a slightly greater distance (43 centimeters). The plasticine ball launched by the astronaut behaved in a similar way. He, too, having flown some distance, turned over around his axis.

The discovered effect, called the "Dzhanibekov effect", began to be carefully studied and found out that the objects under study, rotating in weightlessness, made a 180-degree flip ("somersault") at strictly defined intervals.

At the same time, the center of mass of these bodies continued to move uniformly and rectilinearly, in full accordance with Newton's first law. And the direction of rotation, "twist", after the "somersault" remained the same (as it should be according to the law of conservation of angular momentum). It turned out that relative to the outside world, the body retains rotation around the same axis (and in the same direction) in which it rotated before the somersault, but the "poles" changed places!

This is clearly seen in the example of the "Dzhanibekov nut" (an ordinary wing nut).

If you look FROM THE CENTER OF MASS, then the "lugs" of the nut first rotate in one direction, and after the "tumble" in the other.

If you look from the POSITION OF THE EXTERNAL OBSERVER, then the rotation of the body, as a whole object, remains the same all the time - the axis of rotation and the direction of rotation are unchanged.

And here's what's interesting: for an imaginary observer located on the surface of an object, a kind of complete ! The conditional "northern hemisphere" will become "southern", and "southern" - "northern"!

There are certain parallels between the movement of "Dzhanibekov's nut" and the movement of the planet Earth. And the question is born: "What if not only the nut, but also our planet somersaults?" Maybe once every 20 thousand years, maybe more often...

And how can you not remember catastrophic pole shift hypothesis, formulated back in the middle of the 20th century by Hugh Brown and supported by the scientific works of Charles Hapgood ("The Earth's Shifting Crust", 1958 and "Path of the Pole", 1970) and Immanuel Velikovsky ("Collision of the Worlds", 1950)?

These researchers studied the traces of past disasters, and tried to answer the question "Why did they occur on such a large scale and had such consequences, as if the Earth turned over, changed the geographical poles?"

Unfortunately, they failed to put forward convincing reasons for the "Earth upheavals". Outlining the hypothesis, they suggested that the cause of the "tumble" is the uneven growth of the ice "cap" at the poles of the planet. The scientific community considered this explanation frivolous and recorded the theory as marginal.

However, the "Dzhanibekov effect" forced a new attitude to this theory. Scientists can no longer rule out that the same physical force that makes the nut tumble can also turn our planet... And the traces of past planetary catastrophes clearly testify to the scale of this phenomenon.

Now, my reader, our task is to deal with the physics of the revolution.

Chinese spinning top

The Chinese top (Thomson's top) is a toy, shaped like a truncated ball, in the center of the slice of which the axis is located. If this top is strongly spun, setting it on a flat surface, then one can observe an effect that seems to violate the laws of physics. Accelerating, the top, contrary to all expectations, tips over on its side and continues to turn further until it gets on the axis, on which it will then continue to rotate.

Below is a photograph where physicists observe an obvious violation of the laws of classical mechanics. Turning over, the top does the work of raising its center of mass.

The yellow dot is the center of mass.

The red line is the top's rotation axis.

The blue line denotes a plane perpendicular to the axis of rotation of the top and passing through the center of mass. This plane divides the top into two halves - spherical (lower) and cut (upper).

Let's call this plane - PCM (plane of the center of mass).

Light blue circles are a symbolic designation of the kinetic energy of rotation. The upper circle is the energy of the accumulated moment of inertia of that half of the top, which is located above the PCM. The lower circle is the energy of that half, which is located below the MCP. The author carried out a rough quantitative assessment of the difference in the kinetic energy of the upper and lower halves of the Thomson top (in the version of a plastic toy) - it turned out to be about 3%.

Why are they different? This is due to the fact that the shape of the two halves is different, respectively, and the moments of inertia will be different. We take into account that the material of the toy is homogeneous, so the moment of inertia depends only on the shape of the object and the direction of the axis of rotation.

So what do we see in the diagram above?

We see some energy asymmetry relative to the center of mass. An energy "dumbbell" with "weights" of different power at the ends (light blue circles on the diagram) will obviously create some UNBALANCE.

But nature does not tolerate disharmony! The asymmetry of the "dumbbell" in one direction along the axis of rotation after the flip is compensated by the asymmetry in the other direction along the same axis. That is, the balance is achieved by a periodic change in state over time - a rotating body places a more powerful "weight" of the energy "dumbbell" either on one or the other side of the center of mass.

Such an effect appears only for those rotating bodies that have a difference between the moments of inertia of two parts - conditionally "upper" and "lower", separated by a plane passing through the center of mass and perpendicular to the axis of rotation.

As experiments in Earth's orbit show, even an ordinary box of things can become an object for demonstrating the effect.

Having discovered that the mathematical apparatus from the field of quantum mechanics (designed to describe the phenomena of the microcosm, the behavior of elementary particles) is well suited to describe the "Dzhanibekov effect", scientists even came up with a special name for abrupt changes in the macrocosm - "pseudo-quantum processes".

Periodicity of coups

Empirical (experimental) data collected in orbit show that the main factor determining the duration of the period between "tumbles" is the difference between the kinetic energies of the "upper" and "lower" halves of the object. The greater the energy difference, the shorter the period between body flips.

If the difference in the moment of inertia (which becomes the accumulated energy after the spinning top) is very small, then such a body will rotate stably for a very long time. But such stability will not last forever. At some point there will be a revolution.

If we talk about the planets, including the planet Earth, then we can confidently say that they are definitely not ideal geometric spheres consisting of ideally homogeneous matter. This means that the moment of inertia of the conditional "upper" or "lower" halves of the planet, even if in hundredths or thousandths of a percent, differ. And this is quite enough for it to lead to a revolution of the planet about the axis of rotation and a change of poles.

Features of the planet Earth

The first thing that comes to mind in connection with the above is that the shape of the Earth is clearly far from a perfect ball and is a geoid. In order to show the elevation differences on our planet with more contrast, an animated drawing was developed with a multiplied scale of the elevation difference (see below).

In reality, the relief of the Earth is much smoother, but the fact that the shape of the planet is not ideal is obvious.

Accordingly, we should expect that the imperfection of the form, as well as the heterogeneity of the internal substance of the planet (the presence of cavities, dense and porous lithospheric layers, etc.) will necessarily lead to the fact that the "upper" and "lower" parts of the planet will have some difference in the moment of inertia. And this means that the "revolutions of the Earth", as Immanuel Velikovsky called them, is not an invention, but a very real physical phenomenon.

Water on the surface of the planet

Now we need to take into account one very important factor that distinguishes the Earth from Thomson's top and Dzhanibekov's nut. This factor is water. The oceans occupy about three-quarters of the planet's surface and contain so much water that if all of it is evenly distributed over the surface, you get a layer more than 2.7 km thick. The mass of water is 1/4000 of the mass of the planet, but despite such a seemingly insignificant fraction, water plays a very significant role in what happens on the planet during a revolution...

Let's imagine that the moment has come when the planet makes a "somersault". The solid part of the planet will begin to move along a trajectory leading to a change of poles. What will happen to the water on the Earth's surface? Water does not have a strong connection with the surface, it can flow wherever the resultant of physical forces is directed. Therefore, according to the well-known laws of conservation of momentum and angular momentum, it will try to maintain the direction of movement that was carried out before the "tumble".

What does it mean? And this means that all the oceans, all the seas, all the lakes will begin to move. Water will begin to move with acceleration relative to a solid surface ...

At each moment of time during the process of changing the poles, water bodies, no matter where they are on the globe, will almost always be affected by two inertial components:

Take a look at the picture below. It shows the magnitude of linear velocities at different latitudes (for clarity, several points on the surface of the globe are selected).

Linear speeds differ because the radius of rotation at different geographical latitudes is different. It turns out that if a point on the planet's surface "moves" closer to the equator, then it increases its linear velocity, and if it moves away from the equator, it decreases. But water is not firmly bound to a solid surface! She retains the linear speed that she had before the "tumble"!

Due to the difference in the linear velocities of water and the solid surface of the Earth (lithosphere), a tsunami effect is obtained. The mass of ocean water moves relative to the surface in an incredibly powerful stream. See what a clear mark the past pole shift has left. This is the Drake Passage, it is located between South America and Antarctica. The flow is impressive! He dragged the remnants of the pre-existing isthmus for two thousand kilometers.

On the old map of the world, it is perfectly clear that there is no Drake Passage in 1531 yet... Or it is still unknown, and the cartographer draws a map according to old information.

The value of the inertial components depends on the location of the point of interest to us, as well as on the trajectory of the "somersault" and on what time stage of the reversal we are at. After the end of the flip, the value of the inertial components will become zero, and the movement of water will gradually be extinguished due to the viscosity of the liquid, due to the forces of friction and gravity.

It should be said that on the surface of the globe during the "pole shift" there are two zones in which both inertial components will be minimal. It can be said that these two places are the safest from the point of view of the threat from the flood wave. Their peculiarity is that they will not have inertial forces that force the water to move in any direction.

Unfortunately, there is no way to predict the location of these zones in advance. The only thing that can be said is that the centers of these zones are located at the intersection of the Earth's equators - one that was before the "tumble" and the other that became after it.

Water flow dynamics under the influence of inertial components

The figure below is a schematic representation of the movement of a body of water under the influence of a pole shift. In the first picture on the left, we see the daily rotation of the Earth (green arrow), a conditional lake (blue circle - water, orange circle - shores). The two green triangles represent two geostationary satellites. Since the movement of the lithosphere does not affect their location, we will use them as landmarks to estimate the distances and directions of movement.

The pink arrows show the direction of the south pole movement (directed along the shift path). The shores of the lake move (relative to the axis of rotation of the planet) together with the lithosphere, and water, under the influence of inertia forces, first tries to maintain its position and moves along the shear trajectory, and then, under the influence of the second inertial component, gradually turns its movement in the direction of the planet's rotation.

This is most noticeable if we compare the position on the diagram of the blue circle (water body) and green triangles (geostationary satellites).

Below on the map we can see traces of a water-mudflow flow, the direction of which is gradually reversed under the influence of the second inertial component.

There are traces of other streams on this map as well. We will explore them in the next parts of the series.

Damping effect of the oceans

It should be said that the water masses of the oceans not only bear destruction from catastrophic tsunami flows. But they are the cause of another effect - the effect of damping, which slows down the revolution of the planet.

If our planet had only land and did not have oceans, it would pass in exactly the same way as the "Dzhanibekov's nut" and the Chinese spinning top - the poles would change places.

But, when during the overturn the water starts to move along the surface, it introduces a change in the energy component of the rotation, namely, the distribution of the moment of inertia. Although the mass of surface water is only 1/4000 of the planet's mass, its moment of inertia is about 1/500 of the planet's total moment of inertia.

This is enough to extinguish the energy of the reversal before the poles turn 180 degrees. As a result, on planet Earth, shift poles, instead of a complete revolution, - " shifts poles".

Atmospheric Phenomena During the Pole Shift

The main effect of the "somersault" of the planet, which manifests itself in the atmosphere, is a powerful electrification, an increase in static electricity, an increase in the difference in electrical potentials between the layers of the atmosphere and the surface of the planet.

In addition, a lot of different gases come out from the depths of the planet, including hydrogen degassing, which is greatly enhanced by the stress of the lithosphere. Hydrogen under the conditions of electric discharges intensively interacts with the oxygen of the atmosphere, water is formed in volumes that are many times higher than the climatic norm.

If you find an error, please highlight a piece of text and click Ctrl+Enter.